http://news.linktv.org Link TV News Videos (Filtered by topics: Welfare system) en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:31:00 -0700 Copyright 2011 Link Media, Inc. http://news.linktv.org/videos/us-election-campaigns-ignore-child-poverty?start=0 The US presidential election campaign has focused a lot on strengthening the country's middle class, but little has been said about low-income families. Al Jazeera English reports from an area of Mississippi where more than half of children are living in poverty. Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:31:00 -0700 http://news.linktv.org/videos/us-election-campaigns-ignore-child-poverty Poverty in the United States, US presidential election, 2012, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Poverty, Politics of the United States, Unemployment, Economic inequality, Middle Class, Global Financial Crisis So far the US presidential candidates have focused a lot on strengthening the country's middle class, but little has been said about low-income families, particularly those at the very bottom of the heap. But, with 46 million Americans living in poverty, why are the campaigns so quiet on issues affecting the poor? Shihab Rattansi discusses with guests Cheri Honkala, Marcy Wheeler, and Austin Nichols. http://news.linktv.org/videos/inside-story-americas-can-romney-get-his-campaign-back-on-track?start=0 More secretly recorded video clips of US Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney are released. He is heard talking about who pays taxes in America and about foreign policy. Are we learning anything about Romney's worldview? Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:10:00 -0700 http://news.linktv.org/videos/inside-story-americas-can-romney-get-his-campaign-back-on-track Mitt Romney, US presidential election, 2012, Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012, Politics of the United States, Economic inequality, Political campaign, Welfare system, Barack Obama, John Nichols (journalist), Presidential nominee More secretly recorded video clips of US Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney are released as he scrambles to get his campaign back on track. He is seen talking about who pays taxes in America and about foreign policy. Are we learning anything about Romney's worldview? Guests John Nichols, Scott Helman, and John Feehery discuss. http://news.linktv.org/videos/democracy-now-may-23-2012?start=1955 Census data shows nearly one in two Americans live in poverty, and things could soon get worse if Obama and Congress remain at an impasse over the 2013 fiscal budget, with Republicans calling for cuts to food aid, healthcare, and social services. Wed, 23 May 2012 09:58:00 -0700 http://news.linktv.org/videos/democracy-now-may-23-2012 Egyptian presidential election, 2012, Politics of Egypt, Egypt, Egyptian Revolution, Two-round system, Poverty in the United States, Hosni Mubarak, Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, Welfare system, US Budget Census data shows nearly one in two Americans live in poverty, and now the Congressional Budget Office warns things could soon get worse if President Obama and Congress remain at an impasse over the 2013 fiscal budget. House Republicans are calling for cuts to food aid, healthcare and social services, while protecting funds for the Pentagon. We discuss poverty with Peter Edelman, who resigned as assistant secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services over then-President Bill Clinton's signing of the 1996 welfare reform law that threw millions off the rolls. "Basically, right now, welfare is gone," Edelman says. "We have six million people in this country whose only income is food stamps. That's an income at a third of the poverty line. ... Nineteen states serve less than 10 percent of their poor children. It's a terrible hole in the safety net. Welfare has basically disappeared in large parts of this country." Now a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, Edelman has written a new book, "So Rich, So Poor: Why It's So Hard to End Poverty in America." "I'm very much in support of Occupy," he adds. "The idea ... of the 1 percent and the 99 percent ... all fits together — we really should be all one country." We turn now to the issue of extreme poverty in America. Census data show nearly one in two Americans have fallen into poverty or could be classified as low-income. Meanwhile, more than a third of African-American and Latino children live in poverty. Now the Congressional Budget Office warns things could soon get worse if President Obama and Congress remain at an impasse over the 2013 fiscal budget. Republicans, who control the House, are calling for cuts to food aid, healthcare and other social services, while protecting funds for the Pentagon. On Sunday, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan defended the Republican budget and sought to downplay the massive impact it would have if enacted. REP. PAUL RYAN: What we're saying is, let's get on growth and prevent austerity. The whole premise of our budget is to pre-empt austerity by getting our borrowing under control, having tax reform for economic growth, and preventing Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid from going bankrupt. That pre-empts austerity. The President, his budget, the fact the Senate hasn't done a budget in three years, puts us on a path toward European-like austerity. That's what we're trying to prevent from happening in the first place. That was House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan. Some analysts say the Republicans' budget would actually add to the national debt. According to the Economic Policy Institute, it would also increase the number of people who are looking for a job, resulting in a net loss of more than four million jobs over the next two years. For more, we're joined by Peter Edelman. He is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, was top adviser to Senator Robert F. Kennedy and also a member of President Bill Clinton's administration, until he resigned in protest after Clinton signed the 1996 welfare reform legislation. Peter Edelman has a new book out; it's called So Rich, So Poor: Why It's So Hard to End Poverty in America. Peter Edelman, welcome to Democracy Now! Thank you. It's wonderful to be here. Why is it so hard to end poverty? Because, fundamentally, our economy has been very unkind to the entire bottom half of our people over the last 40 years. We have terrific public policy in place, although it's threatened now by Paul Ryan, as you just showed. But we've done a lot, from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, to food stamps and the earned income tax credit. We're keeping more than 40 million people out of poverty now by the public policy that we have. But that's fighting against the flood of low-wage jobs that we've had over the last 40 years and the fact that people in the bottom half have been absolutely stuck, that the wages for people at the bottom have not—have grown only 7 percent over that 40-year period. So we're fighting uphill with the public policies that we have. It's even harder for people who are—which is single moms in this economy, who are all by themselves in this low-wage economy trying to earn enough to support their children. It's very, very hard to do that with the flood of low-wage jobs that we have. I want to ask about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. In February, he told CNN's Soledad O'Briae that he is not concerned with the poorest Americans. I'm in this race because I care about Americans. I'm not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I'll fix it You just said, "I'm not concerned about the very poor," because they have a safety net. And I think there are lots of very poor Americans who are struggling who would say that sounds odd. Can you explain that? Well, you had to finish the sentence, Soledad. I said I'm not concerned about the very poor that have a safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them. Got it. OK. The challenge right now—we will hear from the Democrat Party the plight of the poor, and—and there's no question, it's not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor. But my campaign is focused on middle-income Americans. My campaign—I mean, you can choose where to focus. You can focus on the rich. That's not my focus. You can focus on the very poor. That's not my focus. My focus is on middle-income Americans. That was Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Peter Edelman, you talk about the issue of deep poverty at length in your book. So who are the very poor? To say the least, Governor Romney doesn't know what he's talking about. We've had a terrible hole ripped in the safety net that we have for the lowest-income people in this country. It's nice to hear him say if there is a problem, he's going to fix it—not too credible, since he says he's not even focusing. But 20 million people now—and these are census numbers—live in deep poverty, extreme poverty, incomes below half the poverty line. That's below $9,000 for a family of three. Why is that? Well, partly because the economy has been so weak at the bottom, but the most vulnerable people have lost the safety net of cash assistance. I'm talking about mothers and children, welfare. The 1996 law turned everything over to the states to do what they want. And basically, right now, welfare is gone. We have six million people in this country whose only income is food stamps. That's an income at a third of the poverty line. In the state of Wyoming, there are 644 people in the whole state, 4 percent of the state's poor children, receive TANF, Temporary Assistance to Needy Children [Families], what we now call welfare. Nineteen states serve less than 10 percent of their poor children. It's a terrible hole in the safety net. Welfare has basically disappeared in large parts of this country. The Clinton administration presided over a drastic transformation of U.S. welfare laws. I mean, people talk about the tremendous rift in Washington between Democrats and Republicans, but you might say, on the issue of poverty, it's a kind of bipartisan affair, even to mention the word. But I want to go back to President Clinton in 1996 at the welfare reform signing ceremony. This is when you served under him as assistant secretary of Health and Human Services. The signing ceremony in 1996. PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: But let's not obscure the fundamental purpose of the welfare provisions of this legislation, which are good and solid and which give us at least the chance to end the terrible, almost physical, isolation of huge numbers of poor people and their children from the rest of mainstream America. We have to do that. So that was President Clinton when he signed welfare reform, and I'm sure you remember that day well. I spoke to you in November of 1996, soon after you resigned your post as Clinton's assistant secretary of Health and Human Services. I think it was the first broadcast interview you did. Mm-hmm. You quit over—in protest of the welfare bill. I want to go back to Democracy Now!, 1996. I am deeply opposed to the current welfare law and very troubled by what happened last year in the Congress. It ends a very fundamental entitlement of assistance to children in need. The way the law used to work—and this has completely ended—is that if a family with children satisfied the eligibility requirements—and those were national, federal requirements—they could get aid. What's happened now is it's entirely up to the state, each state, to decide whether it will help people at all, whether it will give them cash or help them with a voucher, whether it will have its system run by a public agency or by a corporation or some private agency. So that was assistant secretary of Health and Human Services—well, former assistant secretary, because he had just quit. President Clinton signed off on welfare reform just before the election. You quit right after he was elected. How hard a decision was that for you? And, well, I'll ask the question I asked you then: why did you wait so long—why did you wait 'til President Clinton was re-elected, given how extremely critical you were of what he had done? Well, that's not correct, Amy. I quit two weeks after he signed the bill, two months before the presidential election. Ah. Just so we're clear about that. You can go back and look at the New York Times. OK. No, I did not wait. And I just couldn't continue. I simply disagreed, as the interview with you shows. This—it's turned out that exactly, I'm sorry to say, what I thought would happen has happened. We had 68 percent of children in poor families on the old welfare system. There was a lot wrong with the old welfare system; it needed to be fixed. It didn't help people to get off and find jobs. We had 14 million people—that's too many—on welfare. But this was a blunderbuss. This was just an axe, a hatchet, that was taken. And so, that 68 percent then, with low benefits in a lot of places, but still legally entitled, as I told you in that interview, down to 27 percent now. That's just a tremendous, tremendous drop. It's fundamentally not there. And in this recession, when you would expect that it would be helpful to people, it turned out that there were 3.9 people on welfare—3.9 million people on welfare at the beginning of the recession. It went up to 4.4 million. Now, food stamps, which worked beautifully in the recession—why? Because there's a legal right to it—went, amazingly, from 26.3 million people to 46 million now, almost 20 million more people on food stamps. Problem is, if you have no income—and now it's six million people who only have food stamps for their income, don't—can't get the cash assistance—you get so much more terrible, deep, extreme poverty. I mean, that's extraordinary figures that you cite. One of the things that you point out in your book is that states now practically have a disincentive to give cash assistance, to give welfare. Why is that? States have complete—I'm sorry, the question is why— States are practically given an incentive not to give cash assistance to the poor. Well, states have a block grant, so there's no legal right to it. And starting in the late 1990s, when the welfare rolls plummeted, the states actually found that they had money to spare. Instead of raising benefits or letting people who actually needed help get it, they pushed people away at the door. That's how they got the rolls down to about four million people, from 14 million. And they started spending the money in other ways. So we come to the recession, and they're spending the money on other programs. They're spending money to support the child welfare system, a number of other programs, but they're not helping families that have desperate need. And that's because it's entirely up to them what they do with the money, as long as it stays in some way that's related to the question. But they don't have to extend a dollar of benefits to low-income people. And that's why we have such a—such a tremendous diminution in the case log. The millions of people who only have food stamps? That's their only, if you could call it, income? It isn't? Yes, yes, yes. Jason Deparle did a fabulous piece of reporting two years ago in the New York Times — and these are government figures, but nobody had really gone and dug them up — and found that—it's an astonishing number—found that six million, 2 percent of our population, have no income except those food stamps. The food stamps is the sole thing that stands between them and being totally without any income. We're speaking with a guest who quit as a high-level official in the Clinton administration over welfare reform—that was, what, almost 20 years ago—but continues to deal with these issues with a new book, So Rich, So Poor: Why It's So Hard to End Poverty in America. We'll come back to Peter Edelman after break. http://news.linktv.org/videos/can-france-afford-to-save-the-euro?start=0 As the European financial crisis deepens, poorer countries on the verge of default are looking to France to help save them. But now there is doubt whether the struggling French economy can afford to pay for any more expensive bailouts. Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:48:00 -0700 http://news.linktv.org/videos/can-france-afford-to-save-the-euro France, European sovereign debt crisis, Eurozone, Economy of France, Bailout, Euro, China Investment Corporation, Jin Liqun, Greece, Economy of Greece As the European financial crisis deepens, poorer countries on the verge of default are looking to France to help save them. But now France itself is coming under increasing financial pressure as experts question whether it can afford these expensive bailouts. Channel 4's conomics editor Faisal Islam has this special report.